N10026-090 · blank operator worksheet

Purchase-scope comparison card

Use one card for one TikTok website-ad campaign, one GA4 property and one stated period. Name the exact metrics before comparing counts. Keep the private exports and order records in your owned campaign system.

Download the blank comparison CSV

Blank template: No account is connected, no purchase is measured, and nothing typed here is saved or submitted. The diagram shows reporting boundaries, not a matched customer path or an incrementality result.

Three reporting boundaries

Three independent lanes: TikTok credits received Purchase events to eligible ad interactions, GA4 groups purchase events by session source or event credit, and the commerce authority reconciles orders and refunds. Their counts need not equal.
Conceptual diagram. On a narrow screen, scroll horizontally for readable labels. No lane contains a person-level join to another lane.
  1. TikTok Ads Manager: attributed web Purchase events under the selected ad interactions and attribution settings.
  2. GA4: observed purchase events grouped by Session source, or purchase key-event credit allocated under an event-scoped model. Name which one you used.
  3. Commerce: completed and refunded orders under the business's own reconciliation rule. This is the record for actual sales, not proof of the ad's incremental effect.

A. Name the campaign and link

Inspect the URL after redirects. Do not paste a private tracking URL into a public copy.

B. Record three separate report definitions

TikTok Ads Manager
GA4 web property
Commerce or payment authority

C. Diagnose the gap in a fixed order

D. State the decision and the unknown

Current status

Client wording: “TikTok reported [named web Purchase count] under [ad credit settings]; GA4 reported [named purchase metric] under [traffic-source scope]. The order ledger confirms [completed/refunded orders]. We verified [reason]; [remainder] remains unresolved. Neither platform count alone establishes incremental sales.”