Blank editorial worksheet · N18-SR-01

Sourcing-route comparison card

One card covers one brief. Fill section A once, then copy sections B and C for each route you sample, or use the blank CSV register. The route map shows the order.

Local blank template. No submit action, no saving, no example brand or result. Keep briefs, creator names and private notes in your own workspace. This is an editorial method, not legal advice.

A. The brief as testable filters

Brief id, date and product version

Decisive attribute, in observable termsWhat a reviewer could see or hear in a creator's own work.

Language and platforms required

Time box per route (minutes), set before starting

B. Marketplace sample

Marketplace and the help page you read

Date you read it

Brief attributes the tool can filter or search

Brief attributes the tool cannot filter, to be checked by eye

Terms, fees and who contracts with whom, as the tool's page states themWrite "not stated on the page I read" where that is true.

C. Manual sample

Platform and search you ran

Minutes actually used

Candidate work URLs and dates opened

Contact route found for each candidate, or unknown

D. Compare and choose

Candidates where the decisive attribute was seen (marketplace / manual)

What remains unknown for each route

Route chosen for the next block

Decided by and date

Switch condition, written before the next block